Dustindiamond.com Guestbook Comments #78101-78200

28th June 2006 - 05:46:37 PM

78200 : Gay Zack

Thanks for the heads up, I've responded to him, I need to work on getting some hot Screech scat pictures together. I'll try to do that tonight. Also starships is asking for a good ol' fashion gang bang by some angry queers. We need to work to make him look like a homophobe who is following us around and harassing us.

28th June 2006 - 05:36:06 PM

78199 :

Gay Zack, someone finally posted a message at the ScatPlay dustin Yahoo Group. He apparently wants more info about taking a dump on diamond - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scatplaydustin/

28th June 2006 - 04:11:11 PM

78198 : Gay Zack

Those bastards at the imdb deleted our Jeremy is fat thread. I wonder if it was my turkish snowcone comment or that fuck starships-1 complained. He's my new bitch.

28th June 2006 - 03:03:02 PM

78197 : Gay Zack

Screech, I'm willing to give you a Turkish snowcone immediatly. Please respond.

28th June 2006 - 02:36:13 PM

78196 : Belding

Screech, cum down to my office for some hot scat play. I will use your mouth as my persoanl sewer. Mr. B

28th June 2006 - 11:53:10 AM

78195 : Comin\' to get cha

I hate you and you're a prick Dustin, but I'm going to be so happy seeing you on the news getting arrested. You should probably kill yourself. Cocane is a hell of a drug, you'll have a blast sucking dick for rocks instead of stealing money from non-profit organizations. Burn in hell!

28th June 2006 - 11:06:22 AM

78194 : Maxx the Magican

HEY FUCKFACE! Listen up you little shit, every day young adults walk up to me and ask "Why did you disappear after season 3?" and "What happened to the Maxx, Max?" and I lied under my breath about how I lost the company's payroll on the track, when the truth was that Screech told me he had a sell out show in Miami for his hit stand up show and that I could do my magic show. I was mortified when I saw only 3 drunks and none of them laughed at the adult humor, which I always thought was a little low brow, especally for a family entertainer for Screech. Well Screech, I'm back; and I want my Maxx back, my money back and I've got a few magic tricks to show you, such as the "disappearing magic wand up your ass" and the "amazing slipknot of doom" as well as the "circular powersaw from hell!" Get back to me you little fucker so I can make the Statue of Liberty disappear... into your ASS!

28th June 2006 - 10:45:51 AM

78193 :

17th August 2004 - 10:00:10 PM 9747 : Remember when... Hey Screech, remember the time when you, Zack, Kelly, Slater, and Jessie all attended the "Murder Mystery" weekend? Remember when you opened the door to the house and the butler scared you so much that you jumped into the warm and comforting arms of Slater? Remember when you had that huge "white man's afro" because you wanted your head to look like a large version of Slater's hairy left nut? Remember when the piano player was killed and you took it upon yourself to unmask the murderer, so you dressed up as Sherlock Holmes? Remember how you smoked a pipe in a pathetic attempt to resemble the famous detective? Remember when Mr. Jamison told you, Zack, and Lisa that the game was over and that you should come to his office for free vouchers for next week's murder mystery? Remember when Zack and Lisa suggested the you go to Mr. Jamison's office by yourself to get the vouchers? Remember when there was a power outage at the time and you couldn't see anything when you got to Mr. Jamison's office? Remember when you fumbled around in the dark until you heard Lisa from the corner of the room and she told you she finally wanted to go out with you? Remember how you excited you were and how you immediately pitched a tent? Remember when Lisa told you to drop your pants because she wanted to warm you up? Remember how weird it felt when you stuck something in your butt and when you asked what it was, she said it was an unlubed dildo? Remember the strange sensations you felt as this went on for several minutes? Remember how confused you were when Lisa removed the dildo and how you heard a deep voice moan and then felt warm liquid spraying all over your back? Remember when the power came back on and you discovered that Mr. Belding had been buttslamming you the entire time and Lisa had helped him to trick you? Remember what a good laugh all of you had because hey, it really was a good practical joke? Remember how much less funny you thought it was 6 months later when the crabs that Mr. Belding gave you that night were finally eradicated? Mr. Belding got you good that time!

28th June 2006 - 09:59:42 AM

78192 : corn shit explosion

saved by the bell was a huge pile of shit and screech is a complete tool who deserves everrything coming to him. eat shit and die screech.

28th June 2006 - 09:47:37 AM

78191 : Cyncial Joe

Call me cynical, Screech, but I think the whole "Save my home. I'm getting kicked out. I need to raise $250,000." is an overtly cynical attempt to generate money, publicity and marketing for your character, Screech; a character you've spent years trying to distance yourself from with your blue humor, adult "comedy" and poor sketch shows. I think you losing your home is bad, but the whole way you're going about it is incredilous and cynical.

28th June 2006 - 06:21:08 AM

78190 :

Continued... Remember how you tried to make a sharp exit from the stage, but it was too late and you were already being held aloft by a sea of queer hands? Remember how you struggled at first but eventually gave in as the prying hands touched every part of your hairless virgin body, including your 1.5" maggot? Remember how you looked at that queer black guy the wrong way, and he signaled to all his queer buddies to drop you on the floor? Remember how the entire room was pissed off with you for dissing their black 'bro? Remember how they all took turns to violate you by ripping handfuls of your 'fro out as they sodomized you? You sure got a lesson in the Queen's English that time, buddy!

28th June 2006 - 06:14:09 AM

78189 : Fondler

Diamond, how about that time you bought your stand-up act to the West End of London? Remember how excited you were to be performing at all those high-end London venues? Remember how you thought Old Compton Street was the cutting edge of the comedy circuit? Remember the first time you pulled up outside the venue called Escape in your hired limo, and felt like a champ? Remember how puzzled you were at the way the men were dressed, how they all had coloured handkerchiefs hanging from their back pockets, skin-tight white T-shirts and tight 501's, and how none of them had girlfriends? Remember how they were all drinking alco-pops? Remember when you got up on stage to start your act, and a hi-NRG disco version of the SBTB theme was pumped over the sound system at deafening volume? Remember how all the guys ripped off their T-Shirts, took a hit of amyl nitrate and started dancing along to the music in a really aggressive, predatory homosexual fashion?

28th June 2006 - 03:43:23 AM

78188 : Ricardo

Hey Screech, remember me? I was the pale-skinned, starry-eyed young latino boy you picked up in that bar a few years back. Remember how we chatted, you kept buying me drinks and wowing me with your mega-stardom, and we just really hit it off? Remember how you wound up taking me back to your place for some hot man-on-man action? Remember how I was apprehensive at first because I was a virgin, but eventually I let you slide your jew-pole up my tight young pink-chute? Remember how, after the love-making, you held me in your string-bean arms and I told you that even though we'd only just met, I thought I was falling in love with you? Remember how we fell asleep in each other's arms and you thought that this would be the start of something really special? Remember how joy turned to horror the next morning when you discovered I wasn't there, and that I'd ripped off all your valuables and cash? Remember how you also discovered a note I'd left, saying that I wasn't a virgin at all but was in fact a hardened Puerto-Rican hustler, and congratulations cos you now had AIDS? Remember how you I'd also left a huge, corny shitlog on your sunken hairless chest? I sure zinged you good that time buddy!

28th June 2006 - 01:35:36 AM

78187 : Steve

Hey screech, have you ever been to the Sydney Gay & Lesbian Mardi-Gras? My gay pal Brion was there in '01 and he says you were wearing an all-zubaz sailor suit, and you sucked each other off in a back alley. That's great, I didn't know you were gay buddy, all the best with your coming out when you decide to do it. BTW you might wanna look into some kind of penis enlargemnt techniques, Brion tells me you only had 1.5 inches and your pop-shot was a dribbler. I mean, I'm just saying, but that's pretty damn small. Still, if you're happy like that then more power to ya.

28th June 2006 - 01:20:19 AM

78186 : starships-1

i want all you queers to come flame me! gimme everything youve got fagggots!!!!! http://imdb.com/name/nm0588595/board

28th June 2006 - 12:19:49 AM

78185 : starships-1

PPPPPPPPPLORP UH-OH I made poopie in my drawers. kurt yes you can vacum clean my apratment if you like it is very untidy tho and there are pictuers of jemery millar every wher that ive done sex-wee on. desipte whwat my psots on imdb board say im am very gay and i LOVE JEMERY AND WNAT TO MARRY HIM. PPHHHPPPPPPFFFPPP UH OH made poopie again.

28th June 2006 - 12:03:41 AM

78184 : Ant

Screech, remember when I saw you pissing at a urinal? Remember when you pissed on my foot and then I kicked the shit out of you and raped you and gave you AIDS?

27th June 2006 - 10:07:07 PM

78183 : Kurt Steinberg

Hey starships-1, let's hook up for some hot and sweaty unprotected buttsex! I will show you my "vacuum cleaner" queer sex move in a gas station bathroom. I'll do you in the ass wheelbarrow style, and then I will push you hard into the stall, so that your arms give out and your face hits the floor. Then, with my hard penis still lodged in your cornhole, I will push your face up and down and all around the bathroom floor, kind of like the way one vacuums a room! I'll make sure that it's a really dirty bathroom with caked-on urine, shit, and queer jizz on the floor. By the time I was done with you, your face will be coated with the old urine, shit, and queer jizz! Let's have sex!!!!!!!!!!

27th June 2006 - 09:12:35 PM

78182 : Concerned Citizen

This board isn't nearly as queer as it used to be! Fags get off your fannies and start queering this place up. Right now we've got Greg Louganis gay, we need to quickly get to Liberace gay!!!! Damn I wish they made a buttplug in the shape of Diamonds schnoz!!!

27th June 2006 - 09:02:41 PM

78181 : starships-1

jemery, dustin is a lozar dont marry him! mary me i lovve you and i want to eat youre poo-plops

27th June 2006 - 08:54:15 PM

78180 : starships-1

OMG me wants to suck greazy fartss out of jemery millar's poophol

27th June 2006 - 05:46:31 PM

78179 :

lna86 from the imdb message boards, be sure to visit: http://s12.invisionfree.com/Dustin_Diamond_Love/index.php

27th June 2006 - 05:01:36 PM

78178 : Rocco

I'm not giving any of my cash to that guy either. But I would make a small donation if he met me with that fro wig on behind the Carl's Jr. at Bamer and San Bisbo! ROCCO

27th June 2006 - 04:57:28 PM

78177 : Professor Internet

Diamond, the internet sure has screwed you over this time, hasn't it buddy! What in the name of Allah's cock did you expect from your miserable, sniveling little begging campaign? I've met refugees and black people with more self respect and dignity than you, you little fuckwad! Get on the streets where you belong, then I can give you a right horrorshow tolchocking oh my brother!

27th June 2006 - 02:13:12 PM

78176 : Kurt

Awesome site! I love the picture of the guy with the jew-fro wig!

27th June 2006 - 02:07:48 PM

78175 : Litte Timmy

whoever really likes screech better check this site out!! http://www.screwscreech.com/home.htm

27th June 2006 - 01:48:40 PM

78174 :

These old posts by the real Diamond are awesome: http://www.dustindiamond.com/guest/guest.html?displayBegin=6008

27th June 2006 - 01:43:31 PM

78173 : Kurt

A ton of my earlier posts on the Miller board were also deleted. That's unfortunate, as we really contributed a lot to that message board.

27th June 2006 - 01:14:14 PM

78172 : Gay Zack

I'm there Kurt, I notice some posts have been deleted on the Jeremy Gay Miller thread. Shame, I'm sure some of those where mine. They seem to delete a lot of my posts, surprised they haven't banned me.

27th June 2006 - 12:07:03 PM

78171 : Brandon Tartikoff

Screech, I've had another idea for "Diamond in the Rough" that I wanted to run by you. How about doing an episode where you tell everyone that you have a 10-inch schlong, even though in reality it's 1.5 inches? Then you get an audition for an acting job with a nude scene, and you try and fashion a fake schlong out of mincemeat, but it falls off during the audition. What do you think? Pretty original, huh??

27th June 2006 - 11:50:37 AM

78170 : Kurt

Gay Zack, starships is back on the Jeremy Miller imdb board trying to hetero- everything up. The forces of queerness must join together to combat this aggression to ensure that the Jeremy Miller message board stays gay. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0588595/board/nest/44610974?d=46760959#46760959

27th June 2006 - 11:42:43 AM

78169 : Gay Zack

Screech, do you remember when your uncle used to molest you as a small child by shoving chess pieces in your ass. Remember how he had the Star Trek chess set and he shoved a Sulu and Capt. Kirk in your ass so far that it got stuck and he had to take you to the emergency room. How'd he explain that one to them without raising suspicion? Remember when he bought the Simpsons chess set and tried to shove the entire Simpsons family in your ass, he got in Marge, Homer, Bart, Lisa, but couldn't fit Maggie in, so he kept pushing and forcing it in and ended up ripping your anus and blood gushed out? Remember how after that happened he shoved a Grandpa Simpson and Mr. Burns up your bloody ass. Those were good times for you.

27th June 2006 - 11:02:26 AM

78168 : Danny Pintauro

OH SCREECH, WHY DON'T WE MAKE LOVE LIKE WE USED TO???? YOU THINK I'M UGLY DON'T YOU. SAY IT!!! SAY IT!!!!!!!!!!!

27th June 2006 - 10:41:50 AM

78167 : Brainy Smurf

Screech, remember me from the early-80s cartoon, "The Smurfs"? I'm a nerd just like you. Papa Smurf and Gargamel used to pull trains with me right in front of Groucy Smurf who would jerk off at the sight of this. We need to hook up immediately. We've both been homosexual rape victims, so making tender love to you will feel so nice, Screechie-poo!

27th June 2006 - 10:15:06 AM

78166 : Kal El (AKA: Superman)

I am not gay. Quit asking.

27th June 2006 - 09:59:42 AM

78165 : Rocco

Dear Kate, You stink like Diamonds ass after a dumpster party! ROCCO

27th June 2006 - 09:58:04 AM

78164 : Captain Grammar

kate: yes, Screech is a tool. But please, do not post here again until your level of ability with the English language has progressed beyond that of a retarded 3-year old. Thank you.

27th June 2006 - 09:51:28 AM

78163 : kate

I have never concerned myself with Hollywood in genera. I knw you might find shocking, n but there is a plethora of folks that just aren't impressed.Never watched the show, SBTB- thougth ridicuous and you were beyond laughable. I saw you trm yourself a "star?" Homey,. Robert Redofrord is a star. I think my husband is far more the star. I happened to see the story about your soliciing money to "save your home." They are hard to miss in the check-out aisle. I also read some of these messages you have in your file folder. Shameful the cruel; things people say. Too much time on their hands and flat out rude. This is not to be on that tone. I wnat to say: I find it reprehensible that you would ask complete strangers to resccue you.Insulting.For your own self worth, you need to delete this idea.You had a good chance to make money and blew it. Compare youeself with a sick child. You should be beynond shamed.

27th June 2006 - 09:49:06 AM

78162 : Brandon Tartikoff

Hey Screech, I'm back from the dead and I want to give you your own sitcom. It'll be called "Diamond in the Rough" and it will be a SBTB spin-off in which Screech has moved to LA to make it as an actor. You move into an apartment and are shocked to discover that your wacky neighbour is none other than Milo the Janitor. There is ongoing sexual between the two of you. You have a hard time making it as an actor until a chance meeting with your old friend Slater leads to a bit-part in a gay porno. Everything snowballs from there and Screech becomes a full-fledged queer icon and superstar, and in the last episode the "will he, won't he" question is answered when you get married to Milo. It's the part you were born to play, toots!

27th June 2006 - 09:26:37 AM

78161 : Hot Karl

Yo Screech, remember me? I'm the random dude you hooked up with in the rest-room of a sleazy truck-stop restaurant in North Dakota. Remember how I sucked off your 1.5-inch twizzler and made you say "ZOINKS!"? Then remember how I slugged you in the nads after I'd dumped my cum inside you, and then I dropped a deuce in your hair whilst you were curled up in pain on the urine-soaked floor? Remember how I went back into the restaurant and told all the hairy, pot-bellied truckers that you were in the bathroom, ready for love? Remember how you were gang-raped by them? You sure got used to the taste of trucker spooge that time!!

27th June 2006 - 09:19:31 AM

78160 :

16th August 2005 - 10:02:32 PM 71744 : Ox Screech, remember that episode from Good Morning Miss Bliss when you were listening to a tape of hits from the 80s on your Walkman during your lunch period? Remember when Soft Cell's "Tainted Love" was played and you were singing along? Remember when Zack said "SHUT THE FUCK UP, DICKHEAD!!!" and ordered you to stop? Remember when you started crying and ran to the bathroom to wipe away your tears? Remember when you walked into the bathroom and ran into Milo, the janitor, who was cleaning up the urinal after your friend Mikey had taken a shit in it? Remember when Milo asked what was wrong and you told him that the other kids were making fun of you because you were singing "Tainted Love"? Remember when Mile replied "hey White Chowder, do you really like Tainted Love"? Remember when you replied that you did? Remember when he said "well then why don't I give you some tainted love then, Snowflake"! Remember when Milo threw you face first into the bathroom stall and then yanked off your Zubaz and lodged the handle of his mop in your rectum? Remember when he dropped trow and rubbed his taint all over your face and then took a shit on your 'fro? Remember when he said "give me some 'tainted love,' FAG!!!" Remember when he rolled you over and had unprotected buttsex with you just like he used to do with the HIV+ inmates at the county jail when he served his sentence for child molestation? Milo sure got you good that time!

27th June 2006 - 08:34:31 AM

78159 : Mark Almond

Screech, when will you give me some of that TAINTED LOVE?... by which I mean your hiv+ infected cum loads?

27th June 2006 - 07:24:48 AM

78157 : filthy faggot

screech, if you're selling farts, why not scrape some of the cheese of your balls and sell it as well? I'd buy that for a dollar!!

27th June 2006 - 05:45:28 AM

78156 : Robert Redford

Hey Screech, I have an indecent proposal for you - I wanna pay you $1 million to spend one night with me. Think about it buddy, all your problems would be solved, and all you'd have to do is let me cram my leathery old ding-dong up your ass. Well, OK, maybe a bit of scatplay as well. Oh and I'd want to film it all, natch. So whaddayasay.

27th June 2006 - 05:32:29 AM

78155 : admin

hello i am the admin of www.theunprettier.com and hope you all sign up and post on our different topics. in the tv section we have a saved by the bell thread which i have brought to peoples attention the plight of dustin diamond.

27th June 2006 - 04:18:50 AM

78154 : Another Concerned Citizen

Jessy, are you the same pointless, white-trash piece of Marilyn Manson's excreta that used to post here under the name "Twyla"? I was hoping you'd slashed your wrists a long time ago. You and your inane emo-goth angst-ridden drivel are not welcome here, please get the fuck out immediately and don't come back.

27th June 2006 - 01:11:00 AM

78153 : fartsniffer

I want a peice of that fart juice too...

26th June 2006 - 10:24:54 PM

78152 : Concerned Citizen

Dustin is it true that you are soon going to be bottling your noxious farts and selling them to your "fans"? If so please put me down for 1 bottle of your heinous gas. I plan to sniff it while masterbating, and watching the movie Schindlers List. Can't wait!

26th June 2006 - 08:49:22 PM

78151 : Rocco

Diamond, Today I watched an episode of the New Class where you and Belding were on a bicycle built for two. This gave me a great idea. I'd like to get a bike built for two, I'll stear the bike and you can peddle. While we are moving I'll remove my tight bicycle shorts and raise my ass in the air. Getting excited??? Then I'll release a huge torrent of diareahh onto your face, which you can gobble up! After that I expect you to keep peddling while tounging my asshole clean! If you fail to do any of these items I will catch your balls in the chain of the bike and do a burnout! Sound good? You know where to find me you pile of shit! ROCCO

26th June 2006 - 07:15:20 PM

78150 : Jessie Spano

I'm so excited... I'M SO SCARED!!!!!!

26th June 2006 - 06:57:28 PM

78149 : Jessy

oh i see but i used to be here all the time lol so sucks for you you all must deal with my boredom for summer has once again rolled upon us and im not in college yet so... haha deal with it bitches

26th June 2006 - 05:56:58 PM

78148 : Kurt Steinberg

Hey Jessie (the one with the www.myspace.com/84999301 link), why do you keep posting here? This is a QUEERS-only guestbook! Nobody cares about your crappy myspace webpage. Only MALE QUEERS should post here. This webpage was set up to provide Diamond's queer fans with a forum for (a) exchanging gay fantasies involving Diamond; (b) telling Diamond how much he sucks; and (c) scheduling gay sex with Diamond. Homosexuals come here for the sole purpose of finding hot spank material! If your post doesn't relate to any of these things, the guestbook moderator will probably delete your message.

26th June 2006 - 05:49:05 PM

78147 : www.myspace.com/84999301

lol i posted a bulletin to see if anyone could find my links: yeah i found like 10 of them ----------------- Original Message ----------------- From: Panik Date: Jun 26, 2006 3:45 PM lol there are tons of them just keep looking lol ----------------- Original Message ----------------- From: Plague Date: Jun 26, 2006 3:39 PM hahahaha christ babe, nambla? ----------------- Bulletin Message ----------------- From: Panik Date: Jun 26, 2006 3:34 PM i put in hidden links all over my profile and they make sense as to what word they are linking aleast most of them do you should see how many you can find

26th June 2006 - 03:28:57 PM

78146 : www.myspace.com/84999301

it wont let me hyper link it so i guess youll have to copy paste should you decide to view the awesomeness that is me

26th June 2006 - 03:23:28 PM

78145 : www.myspace.com/84999301

you should all visit my myspace because its the shit and i write some awesome code plus my page is full of hidden links including one to this site click here to view it

26th June 2006 - 02:42:56 PM

78144 : www.myspace.com/84999301

lol dustin doesnt need the site im sure he gets off to reading about what all of these guy want to do to him you know he loves it

26th June 2006 - 02:09:47 PM

78143 : Lance

Funny posts re: the savedbythebellnow.com retards: 14th April 2004 - 10:07:59 PM 7100 : Alex This site is fucking hilarious. Ignore all those dumbasses that can't take a joke. I would fucking love it if the entire internet consisted of just this and www.imrickjamesbitch.com 14th April 2004 - 02:53:17 PM 7092 : Tommy Testicle Hey Barb, could you please lick my asshole? It would be greatly appreciated - Thanx. 14th April 2004 - 02:24:52 PM 7091 : Barb This site is horrible! It shouldn't even be on the net, especially not a domain. Dustin should have won his case in court against you....Dustin doesn't deserve this crap for you or anyone else... 14th April 2004 - 12:32:02 AM 7083 : Erika To the site owner... YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF! GIVE DUSTIN HIS WEB ADDRESS BACK!

26th June 2006 - 01:48:05 PM

78142 : Lance

Saved By the T-Shirt Ben Carrozza Perennial dork Dustin Diamond, best known for playing Screech Powers on TV series Saved By the Bell, has shown he doesnít just play a loser on TVóheís one in real life, too! The apparently destitute Diamond needs to raise $250,000 so he doesn't lose his houseóand he wants fans to foot the bill. Appearing on Howard Stern's satellite radio show, the 29-year-old former actor said he needs to sell 30,000 shirts at $15 to $20 a piece by the end of June to prevent foreclosure on his home north of Milwaukee. According to his website, Diamond left California to settle in the Midwest but, due to a bad credit rating, was only able to purchase a home on a land contractóa contract in which the buyer makes an initial payment and regular payments thereafter until the purchase price is paid, with no mortgage involved. Diamond alleges that the homeís owners want him out so they can cash in on the flourishing real estate market in his area. Most of Diamondís Saved by the Bell money was allegedly either spent by his parents or lost because of his own ìtax miscalculationsî. The T-shirt features a photo of Diamond holding a sign that says ìSave My Houseî with the back reading: ìI paid $15.00 to save Screech's house.î Given how well such classic t-shirts as ìFBI: Female Body Inspectorî and ìIím with Stupidî have doneóScreechís house should be paid off 15 minutes from now.

26th June 2006 - 12:58:54 PM

78141 : Wheezer

Feldman, You should go to a dumpster party sometime... you might actuall find out what your ass is really for!!!!!

26th June 2006 - 12:10:52 PM

78140 : Balsac Tebager

I want to blow loads of HIV+ semen all over Dustins jew fro as I shit out beef and cheddar induced diarrhea all over his hook nose.

26th June 2006 - 11:43:28 AM

78139 : Kurt

I rented "Jane White Is Sick And Twisted" from Netflix. That's the movie (which looks horrible) where Diamond dresses up as a woman. I'll provide screen captures from that movie soon.

26th June 2006 - 10:51:03 AM

78138 : ECW superstar \'sabu\'

No, but I sure would love to shove my barbed wired covered forearm all the way up it instead... *ZOINKS*

26th June 2006 - 09:59:45 AM

78137 : Steven

Does anyone here want to stick a cactus up Screech's rectum?

26th June 2006 - 09:37:39 AM

78136 : Corey Feldman

Hey CRAM IT, loser! You just wish YOU were hanging with the Double Diggity. Geez you guys are nerds.

26th June 2006 - 08:26:20 AM

78135 : wheezer

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black, Corey?

26th June 2006 - 08:12:34 AM

78134 : Corey Feldman

Hey, you DWEEBS better stop hating on the D-Man! He's a super-stud who's had more pussy than you geekoids can even imagine. And he's a super dude to boot. Rock on Dusty! We're all rootin' for ya!!!

26th June 2006 - 05:01:00 AM

78133 : Maxwell Nerdstrom

Does anyone know any good blues musicians? I think someone needs to write a song called "Dustin Diamond Blues" about how Screech has no money, no house, and now his wife has left him for Corey Haim. It could also make reference to the fact that Screech is a universally-reviled douchebag, and to how Belding and Slater used to torment him by taking smelly HIV+ shits in his hair.

26th June 2006 - 04:21:53 AM

78132 : LOL IM BEAES

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT LOLOLOL I ARE PWN IEOkelwwd

25th June 2006 - 10:51:55 PM

78131 : Kurt Steinberg

Diamond, what happened to your father, Mark Diamond? Why doesn't he lend you some of the money he stole from you to help you save your house? What's up with that?

25th June 2006 - 10:48:08 PM

78130 : Jennifer Misner

Oh Corey, What a wonderfull offer!!! All the beef n cheddars I can handle directly out of a dumpster? Now that's how a real man takes care of his lady! Dustin is a washed up piece of dung who doesn't even have a mom! I'm heading north Corey, tell your mom that I get first dibs on the garbage from that Arby's and that I'm going stick Beef n Cheddars up your ass and eat them like there was no tomorrow! Hot Diggity, my stinky twat is getting excited thinking about a pudgy nude Corey Haim and 40 dumpster saved beef n cheddars. As I make my way north I'm still looking for some hot studs to fuck! Dustin you suck my hairy ass!!!!! Jen

25th June 2006 - 10:29:41 PM

78129 :

78125: try taking a few tips from this guy - http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1630/1607/1600/ulp9.jpg

25th June 2006 - 07:53:26 PM

78128 : tonivankun

Need more shoes on dustin's head!

25th June 2006 - 07:51:15 PM

78127 : Corey Haim

Hey Jennifer, So cool that you left that dog turd Diamond. If you want you should head up to Toronto and live with me and my mom. I cleared it with her and Mom says that's cool shit. We got a Arby's a block away and they always through out tons of Beef n Cheddars at the end of every shift so we can be living large. I take care of my ladies! And the Haimster swings both ways, I got a donkey dick and I'll stick it in anything!!! Write back Jen, hope to see your fat ass soon!!! Peace, C.Haim

25th June 2006 - 05:57:37 PM

78126 : Kurt Steinberg

Does anyone else here think it's funny that Screech and his family moved from his school with Miss Bliss in Indianapolis, IN to Bayside in Los Angeles, CA in an effort to protect Screech from daily rapings at the hands of Mr. Belding only to discover that Mr. Belding had been transferred to Bayside at the same time?

25th June 2006 - 05:28:04 PM

78125 :

I am wondering how many guys have tasted their cum and how they did it? I use to lay in bed and masturbate and aim towards my face and usually it would squirt all over my lips as well. Finally I decided if we expect other dudes to taste/suck us why shouldn't we know what it is like? I sometimes wore Zubaz, a JewFro wig and put my legs over my head or bent over onto myself and came inside my own mouth. I know this isn't anything a guy would discuss face to face with another guy he knows, but on here he can be free to say what he has tried alone. Any others try this before?

25th June 2006 - 04:57:02 PM

78124 : Daddy-Mack-Vader

Yo, Screech is ballin' on a budget. Some cats don't know how he do when it comes to his pimp stroll. That's why he be fucking all y'all girlfriends. Recognise. If your bitch on his shit, it's your bitch you check. Yo, DD Cool L, stay mackin'.

25th June 2006 - 04:25:02 PM

78123 : diamondcutter

It's good to see you back, D-ner. Well said aboot the DDL forum... http://s12.invisionfree.com/Dustin_Diamond_Love/index.php?act=idx

25th June 2006 - 02:49:51 PM

78122 : Lawrence

How's the house going? Your the man now dog!

25th June 2006 - 02:29:57 PM

78121 : Lance

Diamond, is this true? " 24th June 2006 - 04:14:57 PM 78110 : dustin the part i liked about your standup act the best was when you had the mic up to your gut and you could hear all the hiv+ semen swooshing around in your gut" I need to check out your stand-up act the next time you're in town!!!

25th June 2006 - 01:52:47 PM

78120 : screeched my pants

dude...like...i bought a t-shirt from you to prevent you from being homeless. Everyone else should either buy a sponsorship brick or at-shirt to prevent dustin diamond a.k.a screech from being homeless IMMEDIATELY GOD DAMMIT!

25th June 2006 - 12:41:55 PM

78119 : Dner

Holy Shit!!!! Its soooooo fucking great to be back! Hello to all my fellow queers! I'm sure some of you have been on the Dustin Diamond Love forum and I'm glad we gave all of you plenty of spank material until this guestbook opened! But don't ditch the forum though, there is plenty of queer fun to go around! Dner

25th June 2006 - 05:10:37 AM

78118 : queer makoto

hai 2 u screech my name is makoto. how are you today i am fine thankyou. i am gay schoolboy in tokyo japan. i am wanted writing because i am fan of you works. i also think that you are not knowing of poopularness of [cosplay orgys] that are happen in toukyo. they are usual being happen in back alleys and i am often go with my queer cramschool frends. there are not many of [saved by teh bell] type but [pokemon] party is being popular. do you knowing tv show pokemon? once time i went dresst as psyduck and was sexed by pikachu and then had receve [goldne shower] from squertle. when it became time for pickachu to make the white liquid come out he said [pika, pika PIKAAAA!] it was very like the show and and very pleasent. i is sorry for my bad engliush, can you udnerstand? anyway i hope to have of the gay sex with you in teh futur.

25th June 2006 - 05:09:23 AM

78117 : Fonz

AYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!

25th June 2006 - 03:23:42 AM

78116 : Jerry Falwell

Screech, I know you are in financial troubles at the moment so I would like to offer you $50 to squat over a glass coffee table, underneath which I am lying, and squeeze out a big old Stanley Steamer. How about it? You gotta crap sometime so you might as well make some money out of it.

25th June 2006 - 01:18:55 AM

78115 : Sly Stallone

Ey yo! Eyy, it's the Screech!! Eyy, I loved that guy! Ey Screech listen up, I'm thinking of remaking my 1970 Z-list porno flick "Party at Kitty and Stud's", only as a queer porno, and I think you'd be perfect for the role of Kitty! Whaddayasay, buddy? The money's good, and you'll get my big fat tool up your ass!

25th June 2006 - 12:43:50 AM

78114 : Deuce Dumper

hey screech, I wanna give you "nut cluster suprise" - that's where I eat a whole family size bag of peanuts and then the next day I come and take a big dump in your mouth. It's nice and crunchy and full of pieces of undigested peanut. yum yum.

24th June 2006 - 09:38:06 PM

78113 : Remember when you got your ass handed to you?

DECISION Dustin N. Diamond v. Max Goldberg Claim Number: FA0402000237446 PARTIES Complainant is Dustin N. Diamond (ìComplainantî), represented by Brian A. Herro of Herro & Lamont LLC, 2070 Wisconsin Ave., Grafton, WI 53024. Respondent is Max Goldberg (ìRespondentî), 847A Second Avenue, #302, New York, NY 10017. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is (the ìDomain Nameî), registered with Computer Services Langenbach Gmbh d/b/a Joker.com (hereinafter ìJoker.comî). PANEL The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. Michael Albert as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum (the ìForumî) electronically on February 13, 2004; the Forum received a hard copy of the Complaint on February 17, 2004. On February 17, 2004, DECISION Dustin N. Diamond v. Max Goldberg Claim Number: FA0402000237446 PARTIES Complainant is Dustin N. Diamond (ìComplainantî), represented by Brian A. Herro of Herro & Lamont LLC, 2070 Wisconsin Ave., Grafton, WI 53024. Respondent is Max Goldberg (ìRespondentî), 847A Second Avenue, #302, New York, NY 10017. REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is (the ìDomain Nameî), registered with Computer Services Langenbach Gmbh d/b/a Joker.com (hereinafter ìJoker.comî). PANEL The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding. Michael Albert as Panelist. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum (the ìForumî) electronically on February 13, 2004; the Forum received a hard copy of the Complaint on February 17, 2004. On February 17, 2004, Joker.com confirmed by email to the Forum that the Domain Name is registered with Joker.com and that the Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Joker.com has verified that Respondent is bound by the Joker.com registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain-name disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANNís Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ìPolicyî). On February 20, 2004, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceeding (the ìCommencement Notificationî), setting a deadline of March 11, 2004 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, was transmitted to Respondent via e-mail, post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondentís registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts, and to postmaster@dustindiamond.com by e-mail. A timely Response was received and determined to be complete on March 11, 2004. On March 22, 2004, pursuant to Complainantís request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, the Forum appointed Michael Albert as Panelist. RELIEF SOUGHT Complainant requests that the Domain Name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant. PARTIESí CONTENTIONS A. Complainant asserts as follows: ∑ Complainant claims common law trademark rights with respect to his personal name for performing, acting and other entertainment/media products and services, based on his leading role in the television show Saved by the Bell and related television movies and sequels, as well as his appearance in other movies, magazines, and newspapers and his videotape/DVD entitled Dustin Diamond Teaches Chess. ∑ Respondent operates the website , and has continually used the website to portray himself as Complainant. ∑ Respondent offered, over email, to sell the Domain Name to Complainant for $1,800. Complainant refused this offer. ∑ Complainant sent a certified cease and desist letter to Respondent at a California address from the WHOIS database. The letter was returned as undeliverable. Complainant sent another certified cease and desist letter to Respondent at a New York address, which was also returned as undeliverable. Finally, Complainant sent a cease and desist letter to Respondent over email. Respondent refused to comply with the request until he received the letter by certified mail. Complainant mailed certified letters on two separate occasions. Respondent has refused to contact Complainant via phone or U.S. Mail despite several requests. ∑ Complainantís common law trademark rights in his name have acquired secondary meaning, as evidenced by nationwide sale of his instructional video. ∑ Complainantís widespread usage of his trademark dates back to 1987, well before the registration of . ∑ The Domain Name is identical to Complainantís trademark. ∑ Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name, and has not made any legitimate use of the Domain Name. ∑ Respondent is not using the Domain Name as a parody or other legitimate noncommercial fair use. ∑ Respondentís sole use of the Domain Name is to misinform Internet users, tarnish Complainantís name and mark, and divert visitors to the website to a guestbook which includes racist comments, vulgar messages, and links to pornographic websites. ∑ Respondent has not used and has not made demonstrable preparations to use the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ∑ Respondent routinely portrays himself as Complainant on the website. ∑ Respondent uses the email address screech@dustindiamond.com to give the impression that he is Complainant. ∑ Respondent modified the website to disclaim affiliation with Complainant and suggest that the site is a ìfan club,î but has on occasion reverted back to the prior text where Respondent portrays himself as Complainant. ∑ Complainant has never given Respondent permission to use his trademark, and has no affiliation or association with Respondent. ∑ Respondent has no legitimate, good faith explanation of his use of the Domain Name. ∑ Respondent has no trademark rights in Complainantís name. ∑ The following acts on the part of Respondent constitute bad faith: o Respondentís registration and use of a Domain Name identical to Complainantís name and mark. o Respondentís offer to sell the Domain Name to Complainant for $1,800. o Respondentís providing false contact information in the form of the email address screech@dustindiamond.com and responding to message board postings using Complainantís name. o Respondentís dilution by tarnishment of Complainantís mark. ∑ Respondentís disclaimer of association is insufficient to dispel bad faith. B. Respondent asserts as follows: ∑ Respondent is a well known creator of parody websites, including , , and the site at issue in this case, . One of Respondentís websites achieved the distinction of the ìWorst Web Siteî award by . Respondentís websites have spawned numerous imitations and parodies by other creators. ∑ Respondent admits that he has never been known by Complainantís trademark. ∑ Respondentís website is a parody. ∑ The guestbook on Respondentís website is a ìfree speech forum,î which is an integral part of the parody. ∑ Respondent operates the website with no intent of commercial gain. The website has no commercial aspect, sells no products, carries no advertising, and yields no income to Respondent. ∑ Respondent did not register the Domain Name for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the Domain Name to Complainant or to a competitor of Complainant. ∑ Respondent did not register the Domain Name to prevent Complainant from reflecting his trademark in a corresponding domain name. ∑ Respondent did not register the Domain Name to disrupt the business of a competitor. Further, Respondent is not a competitor of Complainant. ∑ Respondent denies ever having offered to sell the Domain Name to Complainant for $1,800. Respondent further denies that the email exchange concerning this transaction ever took place. Respondent notes that Complainant produced no evidence of such an email exchange. ∑ Respondent denies that he ever wrote or posted emails posing as Dustin Diamond. ∑ Respondent denies that he ever portrayed himself as Dustin Diamond. Respondent points to numerous misspellings on the website, specifically of Complainantís name, as evidence that a visitor to the site would be unlikely to think the site was run by Complainant. Respondent further argues that Complainant would never refer to himself as a ìFAMOUS SUPERSTAR AND SEX SYMBOLî based on his public persona and thus that a visitor to the site would not come to believe that the site was operated or sponsored by Complainant. ∑ Respondentís disclaimer of affiliation with Complainant is further evidence that a visitor to the site is unlikely to be confused about the sponsorship or origin of the site. Respondentís prompt addition of the disclaimer after being contacted by Complainantís representative is also evidence of Respondentís good faith. ∑ Respondent challenges the reliability of evidence offered by Complainant suggesting that the disclaimer has appeared and disappeared periodically from his site. Respondent explains that the Internet Archive is an automated system with no human oversight and is prone to error. Respondent contends that the disclaimer has appeared continuously on the site since it was first added. ∑ Respondent never posted in the siteís guestbook under Complainantís name or any other name. Respondent has never posted any content at all to the guestbook. ∑ Respondent has never sent any emails from the contact address on his website, screech@dustindiamond.com. ∑ In February 2003, Respondent attempted to forward to Complainant email he had received that was apparently intended for Complainant. Complainantís representatives expressed no interest in receiving the email, but instead attempted to threaten and harass Respondent into relinquishing the Domain Name. Respondent offers several email messages received from Complainantís representatives. These communications from Complainant alleged, inter alia: that Respondent was ìdefamingî Complainant; that impersonating an actor was illegal; that Respondent had committed a felony; that Complainantís representative was contacting the police and ìwould like to press chargesî; that Complainantís representative had instructed his attorney to file criminal charges against Respondent; that ìTHIS IS JUST THE BEGINNINGî; that ìcharges will be files [sic] today.î ∑ Respondent denies any bad faith relating to Complainantís difficulty in sending mail to Respondent. Respondentís original California address was correct at the time the Domain Name was registered, and when Respondent moved to New York he updated the Domain Name record to reflect his new address. Respondent maintains a mailbox at a Mailboxes Etc., and is not at fault for Mailboxes Etc.ís refusal to accept delivery of a certified letter. ∑ Respondent has never attempted to create consumer confusion by misportraying Complainant or dilution by tarnishment. Respondent offers numerous emails and letters of support as evidence that the public understands the site as a parody. These letters of support and explanation include a letter from a Professor of Cinema Studies who coauthored two well-known books of religious parody among other publications, and a letter from an art correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and the Oxford American. These writers called the website ìan electronic art installation of great wit and outstanding merit,î a ìparody,î and an ìobvious and clearly affectionate joke.î DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ìRulesî) instructs this Panel to ìdecide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable.î Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires that the Complainant prove each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name be cancelled or transferred: (1) the Domain Name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and (3) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. Paragraph 4(a)(i) imposes two requirements: (1) that Complainant have rights in a trademark or service mark and (2) that the Domain Name in question be identical or confusingly similar to Complainantís mark. The Panel addresses these two requirements in order. Common Law Trademark Rights Panels interpreting the UDRP have consistently held that the Policy affords protection to those having common law trademark rights as well as to those having rights in registered trademarks. See, Cedar Trade Assocs., Inc., v. Ricks, FA 93633 (Nat. Arb. Forum Feb. 25, 2000); see also Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. v. Lafwani, D2000-0014 (WIPO Mar. 11, 2000) (ìit is this reputation from actual use which is the nub of the complaint, not the fact of registration as trade marks.î). Many of the cases in which common law trademark rights are asserted have involved personal names that have, through use and publicity, acquired the distinctiveness necessary to become trademarks or service marks: van Hooijdonk v. Tait, D2000-1068 (WIPO Nov. 4, 2000); Stam v. Cohen, D2000-1061 (WIPO Nov. 4, 2000); MPL Communications Ltd. v. Hammerton, FA 95633 (Nat. Arb. Forum Oct. 25, 2000); Feinstein v. PAWS Video Prods., D2000-0880 (WIPO Oct. 21, 2000); Carter v. Afternoon Fiasco, D2000-0658 (WIPO Oct. 17, 2000); Ciccone v. Parisi, D2000-0847 (WIPO Oct. 12, 2000); Estate of Getz v. Vogel, D2000-0773 (WIPO Oct. 10, 2000); Adjani v. Second Orbit Communications, Inc., D2000-0867 (WIPO Oct. 4, 2000); Estate of Shakur v. Shakur Info Page, AF 0346 (eResolution Sep. 28, 2000), Estate of Francis v. Magidson Fine Art, Inc., D2000-0673 (WIPO Sep. 27, 2000); Adu v. Quantum Computer Servs. Inc., D2000-0794 (WIPO Sep. 26, 2000); Marino, Jr. v. Video Images Prods., D2000-0598 (WIPO Aug. 2, 2000); Rattner v. BuyThisDomainName, D2000-0402 (WIPO July 3, 2000); Monty and Pat Roberts, Inc. v. Keith, D2000-0299 (WIPO June 9, 2000); Roberts v. Boyd, D2000-0210 (WIPO May 29, 2000); Winterson v. Hogarth, D2000-0235 (WIPO May 22, 2000); see also Sean Michaels Inc. v. Mark Allan Online Enmít, AF 0214 (eResolution July 2, 2000). Respondent admits that Complainant may have valid trademark rights, but contends that these rights are limited by his own First Amendment rights. In light of the Panelís ultimate finding that Respondent has legitimate noncommercial or fair use rights under Paragraph 4(c)(iii) and has not registered or used the Domain Name in bad faith, the Panel finds it unnecessary to address any potential First Amendment limitations on trademark rights. Complainant in the instant case has established common law trademark rights in his name, DUSTIN DIAMOND, arising from his roles in numerous television shows and motion pictures, most notably the television show Saved by the Bell. Complainantís common law trademark rights are further strengthened by the use of his name as an indicator of source in his instructional video entitled Dustin Diamond Teaches Chess. There can be no dispute that Complainantís use of DUSTIN DIAMOND as a trademark predates Respondentís registration of . Identical and/or Confusingly Similar The Domain Name in question, , is not only confusingly similar to the common law trademark DUSTIN DIAMOND, but in fact nearly identical. It is well established that ì[t]he omission of spaces between the words of the trademark and the addition of the gTLD ë.comí is not significant in determining whether the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainantís mark.î Larson v. Judy Larson Club, FA 96488 (Nat. Arb. Forum Mar. 13, 2001); accord Garnett v. Trap Block Techs., FA 128073 (Nat. Arb. Forum Nov. 21, 2002); see also Gilmour v. Cenicolla, D2000-1459 (WIPO Dec. 15, 2000) (ì[t]he suffix ë.comí and the absence of spacing between the words are inconsequentialî). Respondent argues that a visitor to the website is unlikely to be confused as to the nature or origin of the site based on its content, which includes ìoutrageous ugly and low-tech graphics and numerous obvious errors and misspellings,î including a misspelling of Complainantís name. Respondent does not argue, however, that the Domain Name itself is not identical or confusingly similar to Complainantís mark, setting aside the content of the site. The Panel finds the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainantís common law trademark DUSTIN DIAMOND. Rights or Legitimate Interests Paragraph 4(a)(ii) requires Complainant to establish that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, while Paragraph 4(c) provides three alternative means for Respondent to demonstrate rights or legitimate interests in a domain name: (1) before any notice to you of the dispute, your use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; or (2) you (as an individual, business, or other organization) have been commonly known by the domain name, even if you have acquired no trademark or service mark rights; or (3) you are making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue. Complainant cites Garnett v. Trap Block Techs., FA 128073 (Nat. Arb. Forum Nov. 21, 2002) for the proposition that a mere allegation that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests under Paragraph 4(a)(ii) shifts the burden to Respondent to show by concrete evidence that respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name under Paragraph 4(c). Some panels have held otherwise; see, e.g., Arcturus Engíg Inc. v. Arcturus, AF 0156 (eResolution May 19, 2000) (ìThe complainant's contention that the respondent has not proven it has any legitimate interest is not to the point, since it is the complainant who bears the onus of proof on this issue.î) Because Respondent has met his burden of proof under 4(c)(iii), it is unnecessary for this Panel to decide exactly where the burden under 4(a)(ii) lies. Respondent is not using the website in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services, nor has he presented evidence that he intends to do so. Respondent argues that the ìserviceî he offers is a ìparody or art installation,î however, this argument is more properly directed to rights or interests under Paragraph 4(c)(iii) (legitimate noncommercial or fair use). The Panel is not aware of any cases in which a parody has been considered a ìbona fide offering of goods or servicesî within the meaning of the UDRP, nor has either party to this arbitration brought any such case to the Panelís attention. See, e.g., Oki Data Am., Inc. v. ASD, Inc., D2001-0903 (Nat. Arb. Forum Nov. 6, 2001) (to meet bona fide requirement, domain name holder must offer the trademarked goods and use the site only for the sale of the trademarked goods). Thus, Respondent has not demonstrated rights or legitimate interests under Paragraph 4(c)(i). Respondent admits that he has never been commonly known by the Domain Name. Respondent does not have rights or legitimate interests under Paragraph 4(c)(ii). Respondent argues that his website constitutes legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name, and thus has demonstrated legitimate interests under Paragraph 4(c)(iii). Complainant asserts, with little or no evidentiary support, that the site in question is not fair use or a parody. ìWhether the commentary is in good taste, whether it is funny, whether it is effective, all is beside the point.î Falwell v. Cohn, D2002-0184 (WIPO June 3, 2002). See also Springsteen v. Burgur, D2000-1532 (WIPO Jan. 25, 2001) (no likelihood of confusion between common law mark Bruce Springsteen and domain name because even the relatively unsophisticated Internet user would realize that not every domain bearing the name Bruce Springsteen is an official site). The Panel accepts Respondentís argument that the ìoutrageous ugly and low-tech graphics and numerous errors and misspellingsî as well as the sheer absurdity of the siteís claim that Dustin Diamond is a ìFAMOUS SUPERSTAR AND SEX SYMBOLî clearly signal that the site is not meant to be taken seriously. Whether the site is regarded as parody, satire, or critical commentary, and notwithstanding Respondentís assertion that ì[l]awyers are notoriously bad at understanding how humor works,î this Panel finds that legitimate noncommercial fair use commentary is involved. Complainant contends that the siteís guestbook shows that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the Domain Name. Complainant also offers the guestbook as evidence of Respondentís bad faith in registering the Domain Name. The guestbook contains nearly 7,000 entries, some of which include vulgar messages or links to pornographic content. Respondent characterizes the guestbook as an unmoderated ìfree speech forum,î where visitors to the site can post any content under any name that they choose. While Complainant alleges that Respondent is responsible for some of the postings to the guestbook, Complainant offers no evidence that Respondent himself has ever posted to the forum. Respondent denies ever having posted to the forum, and offers a list of IP addresses from the siteís access log to show that none of the postings came from his system. While Complainant is correct that some of the statements made by users of the forum are offensive or inappropriate to certain audiences, Complainant has not established that any of these statements were made by, or are otherwise attributable to, the Respondent, or that Respondent edits, moderates, or otherwise takes responsibility for the content of materials posted in the guestbook. It would therefore be inappropriate to hold Respondent responsible for the content of the guestbook. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. ß 230(c)(1) ("No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider"); Zeran v. America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997) (AOL not liable for defamatory statement posted to various AOL bulletin boards by an AOL subscriber), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 937 (1998). The Panel finds that the guestbook is not relevant to Respondentís rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name or to Respondentís bad faith. Finally, in order to demonstrate rights or legitimate interests under Paragraph 4(c)(iii), Respondent must show he had no intent of commercial gain. Respondent states that the site sells no products, carries no advertising, and generates no revenue. Complainant has made no effort to rebut this claim, but alleges that Respondent offered to sell the Domain Name for $1,800. Respondent flatly denies ever having made such offer. Complainant has the burden of proof in this case and has offered no evidence that this offer ever occurred. Furthermore, Respondent properly points out that had such an offer been made by email (as alleged by Complainant) there should be some record of the offer. The Panel, agreeing that evidence of any offer for sale is conspicuously absent from Complainantís lengthy submission, finds that Respondent has no intent of commercial gain and thus has demonstrated rights or legitimate interests under Paragraph 4(c)(iii). See Legal & Gen. Group Plc v. Image Plus, D2002-1019 (WIPO Dec. 30, 2002) (ìthe goals of the Policy are limited and do not extend to insulating trademark holders from contrary and critical views when such views are legitimately expressed without an intention for commercial gain.î). Registration and Use in Bad Faith Complainant must satisfy each and every element of Paragraph 4(a) to prevail. Because Respondent has demonstrated rights under Paragraph 4(c)(iii), this Panel need go no further. The Panel will, however, briefly address Complainantís argument that Respondent acted in bad faith under Paragraph 4(a)(iii). Respondent cites a great number of cases in which the registration of a domain name identical to a celebrityís trademark was found to be in bad faith. In all of these cases, however, the respondent had some commercial interest in the domain name, whether it was using the domain name to sell products, display advertisements, or sell the domain name itself for valuable consideration in excess of documented out-of-pocket costs. See, e.g., Weil v. Domain Admír, FA 206341 (Nat. Arb. Forum Dec. 8, 2003) (respondent used website to sell complainantís books for personal profit without permission of the trademark holder); Spacey v. Alberta Hot Rods, FA 114437 (Nat. Arb. Forum Aug. 1, 2002) (domain name redirected to commercial ìCelebrity 1000 siteî); Booz-Allen & Hamilton Inc. v. Servability Ltd, D2001-0243 (WIPO Apr. 5, 2001) (respondent, domain name dealer, tried to sell domain at higher cost); Lee v. Domain Research and Sales, FA 105214 (Nat. Arb. Forum Apr. 1, 2002) (domain name redirected to gambling and pornography site; respondent requested $2,250 for domain name; respondent engaged in pattern of registering famous marks); Larson v. Judy Larson Club, FA 96488 (Nat. Arb. Forum Mar. 13, 2001) (domain name redirected to commercial ìCelebrity 1000 siteî); Brown v. Julie Brown Club, D2000-1628 (WIPO Feb. 13, 2001) (domain name redirected to commercial ìCelebrity 1000 siteî); Kidman v. Zuccarini, D2000-1415 (WIPO Jan. 23, 2001) (website advertised pornographic sites; user was ìmousetrappedî upon visiting site; respondent engaged in a pattern of illegitimate registration and use); Gilmour v. Cenicolla, D2000-1459 (WIPO Dec. 15, 2000) (respondent intended to use domain name to sell exclusive merchandise or sell domain name itself); Adu v. Quantum Computer Servs., Inc., D2000-0794 (WIPO Sep. 26, 2000) (respondent offered commercial email service at domain name); Technology Prop., Inc. v. Hussain, FA 95411 (Nat. Arb. Forum Sep. 14, 2000) (respondent offered domain name for $2,000); Jagger v. Hammerton, FA 95261 (Nat. Arb. Forum Sep. 11, 2000) (pornographic content for commercial gain); Rudner v. Internetco Corp., D2000-0581 (WIPO Aug. 3, 2000) (no content on site, but other sites registered by Respondent linked to pornographic sites); Charles Jourdan Holding AG v. AAIM, D2000-0403 (WIPO June 27, 2000) (respondent offered domain name for sale); Roberts v. Boyd, D2000-0210 (WIPO May 29, 2000) (respondent registered many domain names of well-known celebrities; tried to sell domain name on eBay for $2,550); DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bargman, D2000-0222 (WIPO May 29, 2000) (website contained advertisements; respondent tried to sell domain name on eBay; advertisements constituted ìcommercial useî regardless of lack of net profit by respondent). There are also some cases in which Panels have held that ìpassiveî holding of a domain name ñ no use at all ñ amounts to bad faith use. See, e.g., Stam v. Cohen, D2000-1061 (WIPO Nov. 4, 2000); Garnett v. Trap Block Techs., FA 128073 (Nat. Arb. Forum Nov. 21, 2002); Albrecht v. Natale, FA 95465 (Nat. Arb. Forum Sept. 16, 2000). This case, however, does not involve ìpassive holding.î In sum, Respondent has not cited ñ and this Panel has not found ña single case in which bad faith was found where the respondent engaged in active use that consisted of pure, noncommercial speech in the nature of parody or critical commentary. As discussed above, this Panel does not find credible Complainantís assertion that Respondent offered to sell the Domain Name for $1,800, and there is no other evidence that Respondent had any commercial intent in registering or using the Domain Name. Thus, the Panel concludes that Respondent did not act in bad faith. DECISION The Complainant has failed to establish two of the three elements required under the ICANN Policy. The Panel thus concludes that relief shall be DENIED. Michael Albert, Panelist Dated: Monday, April 5, 2004

24th June 2006 - 08:12:16 PM

78112 : haleechic

just needed a laugh and i wanted to say hell yeah that helps

24th June 2006 - 07:26:22 PM

78111 : Gain

hey max, do you ever check the guest book on this?

24th June 2006 - 04:14:57 PM

78110 :

dustin the part i liked about your standup act the best was when you had the mic up to your gut and you could hear all the hiv+ semen swooshing around in your gut

24th June 2006 - 04:09:51 PM

78109 : Jennifer Misner

Hey there all you cool dudes. Me and Dustin have split. I read my horoscope today and it said lose that zero and get yourself a hero! So here I am. Dusty could never satisfy my unquenchable thirst for Arby's beef n cheddar's. That sack of feces could never provided for his family. We had to live in a shack, and I could only have 20 beef n cheddars a day. I want to be a regular 5-600 pound behometh, and unless I get to 50+ a day I'll never reach my goal. Last night I told him I was leaving and he began to cry and yelled zoinks. Then he farted on his hand and began to smell it over and over. He's a freak. Any studs in here looking for a hot lady let me know! I've been saving up a big shit for my 1st new lover!!! JEN

24th June 2006 - 11:37:18 AM

78108 : D-Man

YOU DON'T FUCK WITH THE D-MAN...unless you are a very well-hung African-American stud perhaps. Oooh I feel all tingly.

24th June 2006 - 11:29:23 AM

78107 : Maxwell Nerdstrom

Oh shit dusty, I just made a sticky mess all over a signed photo you gave me after I saw your standup at The Toolbox, MI. I really prized that photo, please send me another.

24th June 2006 - 11:14:27 AM

78106 : Maxwell Nerdstrom

Oh shit Screech, I'm so fucking hot for you right now, please buddy, hook up with me in a back alley somewhere for gay sex. Every time I think about you living rough on the street, giving blowjobs to your legion of queer fans for pocket change, I get so fucking hard. Ohhh im jerking it righgt now buddy, does that make you hrd im gonna have to sign off its hard to tyhpe with one hand, pleeeeease get in touch real soon sugarbuns.

24th June 2006 - 10:57:37 AM

78105 : Rusty Trombone

Hey Screech. last night I was fellating an elderly gentleman in a cubicle of the men's restroom of a branch of Denny's when I heard two dudes come in to take a piss, and while they were stood at the urinal they started talking about how they'd seen you on Geraldo and how you were a complete fucking douchebag who deserves to live on the street. Just thought you'd like to know.

23rd June 2006 - 09:23:56 PM

78104 : Rocco

Mrs. Diamond, Is it true that you gave birth to Dustin from your ass instead of your vagina? This has been a legend going around for quite some time and I was hoping you could clear it up for me! If this is true did you go to take a nice dump one day and realize that you had released Dustin along with some farts and corn nuggets? You and Mark must have been so proud! ROCCO

23rd June 2006 - 06:46:37 PM

78103 :

someone should start an online petition asking nbc to file a cease and desist order on dustin diamond and charge him with copyright infringement and intellectual property theft

23rd June 2006 - 06:32:15 PM

78102 : Screech

I once had sex with Screech, he said i was the best she-male he ever had. I was rather flattered, what a guy. PS WEN IS HE NEXT SERIES OF ASAVED BY THE HBELL I LOVE THAT EPSIDEO WER DANNIE SHOWS US HIS DONG

23rd June 2006 - 06:07:55 PM

78101 :

another good person to try and contact re: copywright infringement is peter engel, he may also be one of the show's copywright holders.